Drawing for BABY GUND

USPTO serial 76437327

BABY GUND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BABY GUND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George Gottlieb

GEORGE GOTTLIEB GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012COVERS AND NETTING FOR BABY STROLLERS, UMBRELLAS TO BE AFFIXED TO BABY STROLLERSACTIVE—
018UMBRELLAS, ROLLING LUGGAGE, SOFT BABY CARRIERS WORN ON THE BODYACTIVE—
020NAP MATSACTIVE—
021THERMAL INSULATED LUNCH BAGS MADE OF FABRIC FOR FOOD OR BEVERAGESACTIVE—
025PAJAMAS, BLANKET SLEEPERS, NIGHTGOWNS, INFANT AND TODDLER WEAR, NAMELY, ONE PIECE OUTFIT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS COMBINING A TOP AND BOTTOMACTIVE—
028ACTIVITY BARS, MEMORY BOARD SETS, TOYS DESIGNED TO BE ATTACHED TO BABY STROLLERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 8, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 8, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 30, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 29, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 21, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance