Drawing for VALLEYCREST

USPTO serial 76437390

VALLEYCREST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALLEYCREST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam Claire Beezy

MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY GREENBERG GLUSKER FIELDS CLAMAN ET AL1900 AVE OF THE STARSSTE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4590

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Garden ornaments made of plastic or woodACTIVE—
021Containers for household and garden use, namely, flower pots and planters; and ceramic garden ornamentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 6, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 12, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 12, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 3, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 22, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 22, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 22, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 14, 2005CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 30, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 18, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 26, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance