USPTO serial 76437528
GUARDIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GUARDIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brampton, Ontario, L6S 6B7, CA
Brampton, Ontario, L6S 6B7, CA
LEGGETT & PLATT CANADA CO. (SOCIETE LEGGETT & PLATT CANADA)
WATERLOO, CA
Other trademarks owned by LEGGETT & PLATT CANADA CO. (SOCIETE LEGGETT & PLATT CANADA)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clinton G. Newton
CLINTON G NEWTON SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP2555 GRAND BLVDKANSAS CITY, MO 64108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | plastic and other non-metal casters for chairs and other commercial and industrial applications and plastic components for seating, namely seat backs and pans, stadium seats, office chairs, chair bases, chair arm supports and position adjusters for adjusting position of arm rest, excluding seating components designed for use with wheelchairs and for use by mobility challenged persons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shepherd Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Shepherd Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LEGGETT & PLATT CANADA CO. (SOCIETE LEGGETT & PLATT CANADA)
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named GUARDIAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |