Drawing for VINYL

USPTO serial 76437729

VINYL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VINYL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tamara Carmichael

STEVEN J WADYKA, JR ESQ GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP1750 TYSONS BLVD STE 1200MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Accessories and peripherals for computers and electronic transmission equipment, namely, blank computer discs and diskettes, blank disc packs, blank compact discs, namely, CD-ROMs and DVDs formatted for audio and digital dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 31, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 12, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 12, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 15, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 1, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance