Drawing for BASICHUMAN

USPTO serial 76437808

BASICHUMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BASICHUMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond Sun

RAYMOND SUN LAW OFFICE OF RAYMOND SUN20 CORPORATE PARKSUITE 155IRVINE, CA 92606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021trash cans, cleaning cloths for cleaning trash cans, food canisters, mugs, thermal insulated containers for food or beverage, and non-electric coffee makersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 7, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 1, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 27, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 9, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 31, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 11, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance