USPTO serial 76438352
SKINPROTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKINPROTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brookline, MA
THETA BIOMEDIAL CONSULTING AND DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
BROOKLINE, MA
Other trademarks owned by THETA BIOMEDIAL CONSULTING AND DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
Brookline, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dr. Melvin Blecher
DR MELVIN BLECHER LAW OFFICE OF DR MELVIN BLECHER4329 VAN NESS ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20016-5625UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Anti-inflammatory skin creams and lotions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Theoharides, Theoharis C.
- Other trademarks owned by THETA BIOMEDIAL CONSULTING AND DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Theoharides, Theoharis C.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named SKINPROTEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |