Drawing for ZEBA

USPTO serial 76438368

ZEBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZEBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Robinson, Esq.

DAVID A ROBINSON ESQ ROBINSON & COURNOT152 W 57TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Textile Gift Bags; Textile Wine BagsACTIVE—
020Textile BolstersACTIVE—
024textiles, namely, curtains, cushion covers, blanket throws, table runners, bed skirts, bolsters, shams, bed covers, namely, bed spreads, bed linen, bed sheets, bed quilts, bed duvets and bed coverlets; textile napkins and textile place mats; table covers, namely, table linen, table cloths not of paper, table mats not of paper; table mats of textileACTIVE—
027Carpets, rugs, and mats, namely, door mats of textile, coir, jute, wool and cotton, and bath mats of textileACTIVE—
028Textile Christmas Tree SkirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 15, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 20031.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 14, 20031.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Jul 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance