Drawing for NEVER SUMMER NS

USPTO serial 76438652

NEVER SUMMER NS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEVER SUMMER NS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathy J. Futrowsky, Esq.

LISA W ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP815 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-4078UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, SOCKS, OUTERWEAR, NAMELY, COATS, VESTS, SWEATERS, PANTS, SWEATPANTS, GLOVES, MITTENS AND SCARVES; SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, BEANIES, HATS, CAPS, HEADWEAR, JACKETS AND SNOWBOARD BOOTSACTIVE—
028SPORTING ARTICLES, NAMELY, SNOWBOARDS, SNOWBOARD BINDINGS AND PARTS THEREFOR AND SNOWBOARD SKID PADSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 18, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 16, 20031.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Jul 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance