USPTO serial 76438662
WIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 25, 2005
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with WIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
40474 Dusseldorf, DE
Dusseldorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KLAUS P. STOFFEL
KLAUS P. STOFFEL LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 Broad Street21st FloorNew York, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PLANNING, ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING TRADE FAIRS, EXHIBITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS IN WIRE PROCESSING MACHINERY, WIRE MANUFACTURING MACHINERY, AND WIRE PRODUCT MANUFACTURING MACHINERY; ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1986 |
| 041 | PLANNING, ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING TRADE FAIRS, EXHIBITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS IN WIRE PROCESSING MACHINERY, WIRE MANUFACTURING MACHINERY, AND WIRE PRODUCT MANUFACTURING MACHINERY; PLANNING AND ARRANGING CONGRESSES, CONFERENCES, AND TEACHING SEMINARS IN WIRE PROCESSING MACHINERY, WIRE MANUFACTURING MACHINERY, AND WIRE PRODUCT MANUFACTURING MACHINERY; ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY PROVIDING CINEMATOGRAPHIC FILM AND VIDEO SHOWS AND LIVE STAGE PERFORMANCES FOR TRADE FAIR AND EXHIBITION ATTENDEES | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 14, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 30, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 30, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |