USPTO serial 76438742
GARDEN BASICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GARDEN BASICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scarborough, Ontario M1X 1C7, XP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRIET E. PERKINS
HARRIET E PERKINS DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP18TH AND CHERRY STSONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6996Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, combination shampoos and conditioners, both medicated and non-medicated hair straighteners, cream rinses, wave solutions, hair sheens, neutralizer shampoos, setting lotions, hair dress, anti-dandruff shampoos, hair setting gels, hair setting creams, hair setting sprays, hair lotions and permanent wave solutions; cosmetics, toiletries and personal care products, namely, skin lotions, lemon lotion, cucumber lotion, witch hazel lotion, soaps, eau de toilette, eau de cologne, cologne, perfume, bath powder, bubble bath, milk bath cream, after bath oil, dusting powders, talcum powders, bath foams, bath gels, bath beads, bath fragrances, after-bath fresheners, body sprays, essential oils, sun tan lotions, sun tan creams, sun screens, skin creams, skin lotions, skin cleansers, astringents, moisturizers, skin polishers, body shampoos, baby oils, baby powder, baby lotions, baby soap, toilet water, skin fresheners, bath salts, face powder, vanishing cream, massage cream, muscle oil cream, pore cleansers and creams, bleach creams, eye lash creams, depilatory cream, blackhead remover, hair tonic, liquid hairdressing, cuticle softener, cuticle cream, cleansing products for female and male intimate hygiene, namely, soaps and deodorants, antiperspirants, lipstick, rouge, eye shadow, eye pencils, foundations, mascara, blushes, eyeliner, after-shave lotions, after shave colognes, after-shave moisturizer, shaving cream, after-shave balm, deodorant sticks, moisture balm, protective skin conditioner, skin creams, beauty masks, body lotion, liquid and cream make-up, toner, freshener, manicuring preparations, namely, nail enamel, nail enamel remover, nail and cuticle treatment; make-up remover, petroleum jelly, toothpaste, tooth powders, tooth brushes, dentifrice, mouthwashes, dental floss, dental and denture cleaners and adhesives for dentures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |