USPTO serial 76438885
JJ JUNE JACOBS SPA COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JJ JUNE JACOBS SPA COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine M. Baker, Esquire
Christine M. Baker, Esquire MINTZ, LEVIN COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY ET AL666 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10028UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Beauty salon and health and beauty spa services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |