USPTO serial 76438924
ROTHBURY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 2009
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROTHBURY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New South Wales, 2320, AU
Southbank, Victoria, AU
Southbank, Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY D. KRUGMAN
GARY D. KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | WHOLESALE AND RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORSHIPS FEATURING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; DIRECT MARKETING FOR OTHERS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES VIA MAIL, ELECTRONIC MAIL AND BY TELEPHONE; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY ARRANGING FOR SPONSORS TO AFFILIATE THEIR GOODS AND SERVICES WITH WINE TASTING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |