USPTO serial 76439183
STOKO PRELABO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STOKO PRELABO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-47805 Krefeld, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. STRIKER
MICHAEL J STRIKER103 E NECK RDHUNTINGTON, NY 11743-1567UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations, degreasing preparations for cleaning purposes, stain removing preparations, preparations for removing inks, paints and lacquers; soap, in particular disinfectant, deodorant and antiperspirant soap, cakes of soap, bars of soap and liquid soap, soaps for dissolving grease; perfumery, in particular deodorants for personal use, foot spray, antiperspirants; essential oils for personal use, skin-protection preparations, in particular in the form of ointments, pastes, creams, lotions, oils and gels, hand care preparations and face care preparations, cosmetic preparations; detergents, namely automatic dishwashing detergents, dish detergents, dish washing detergents and germicidal detergents; all purpose cleaning preparations; shampoos; hair lotions, dentifrices, toothpaste | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |