USPTO serial 76439626
MAIN CONCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2845920Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2004
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAIN CONCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
52062 Aachen, DE
52062 Aachen, DE
52062 Aachen, DE
52062 AACHEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Peck
Patrick Y. Ikehara KAUTH, POMEROY, PECK & BAILEY LLP2400 E. KATELLASUITE 1050ANAHEIM, CA 92806Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATA PROCESSORS AND COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN EDITING, COMPOSING, COMPRESSING AND DECOMPRESSING AUDIO AND VIDEO DATA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROCESSING; PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND PROFESSIONAL DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, FOR CROSS-PLATFORM CONVERSION OF DIGITAL CONTENT, NAMELY, AUDIO AND VIDEO DATA; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DESIGN OF NETWORK-BASED SOFTWARE OPERATING SYSTEMS FOR THE INTERNET, INTRANETS, EXTRANETS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DESIGN OF MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DESIGN OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; CROSS-PLATFORM CONVERSION OF DIGITAL CONTENT INTO OTHER FORMS OF DIGITAL CONTENT; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB HOME PAGES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING INTERNET WEBSITES AND PORTALS FOR OTHERS; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; UPDATING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAINCONCEPT AG
- Other trademarks owned by MAINCONCEPT AG
- Other trademarks owned by MAINCONCEPT AG
- Other trademarks owned by MAINCONCEPT GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAIN CONCEPT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 25, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |