USPTO serial 76439672
ORAMELT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORAMELT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Biovail Laboratories International SRL
St. Michael, BB
Other trademarks owned by Biovail Laboratories International SRL
St. Michael, BB
St. Michael, BB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher L. Graff
Christopher L. Graff PIRKEY BARBER PLLC600 Congress Ave., Suite 2120Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISORDERS OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, THE IMMUNE SYSTEM, THE CARDIO-VASCULAR SYSTEM, THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM, THE MUSCULO-SKELETAL SYSTEM, FOR THE TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY DISORDERS, AND FOR USE IN DERMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, AND OPHTHALMOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Biovail Laboratories International SRL
- Other trademarks owned by Biovail Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Biovail Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ORAMELT
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |