Drawing for BUSINESS PROCESS INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 76439830

BUSINESS PROCESS INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUSINESS PROCESS INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Cyril Malloy, III

JOHN CYRIL MALLOY III HISTORIC CORAL WAYMALLOY & MALLOY, PA2800 S.W.THIRD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business consultation and analysis services, namely, providing surveys and analysis reports in the nature of best practices and benchmarking of business processes; marketing, namely, promoting the goods and services of others through the provision of customized advertising in print, displays, and electronic media, market research; market analysis, benchmark analysis, namely conducting studies for others regarding best business practices; business consultation in the fields of advertising and marketing, product branding and product promotion; creating trademarks, service marks, brand names and corporate identities for others; providing comprehensive business management and consultation to clients to help clients manage their resources most effectivelyACTIVE—
041training in the use of computers and computer softwareACTIVE—
042computer consultation and integration of computer systems and networks; computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others, designing and implementing network pages for others strategy and architecture technology integration, namely, custom software design for others; consulting services in the field of information technology, infrastructure for others in the field of information technology for information processing systems for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance