USPTO serial 76440228
Z WINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Z WINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William Lawrence Muckelroy
WILLIAM LAWRENCE MUCKELROY WILLIAM LAWRENCE MUCKELROY, PCEWING PROFESSIONAL BLDG STE 3A1901 N OLDEN AVETRENTON, NJ 08618-2101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen fully cooked breaded chicken wing sections, frozen cooked chicken parts; and frozen ready-to-eat chicken pieces | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 12, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |