USPTO serial 76440934
INTENTIONAL ENTERPRISE DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTENTIONAL ENTERPRISE DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurie A. Miller
LAURIE A MILLER INTERNATIONAL DESIGN INCLAW OFFICE OF LAURIE A MILLER 319 RAMONPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture to complement and fully realize chosen strategies and organizational and workplace environment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |