USPTO serial 76440973
ULTRA PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRA PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Weider Nutrition International, Inc.
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Weider Nutrition International, Inc.
Weider Nutrition International, Inc.
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Weider Nutrition International, Inc.
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Preston C. Regehr
PRESTON C REGEHR TECHLAW VENTURES PLLC333 S 520 W STE 220LINDON, UT 84042UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements in the form of tablets, capsules, caplets, ready to eat food bars, and drink mixes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Weider Nutrition International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Weider Nutrition International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by WEIDER GLOBAL NUTRITION, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ULTRA PRO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |