USPTO serial 76441855
SARGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3409529Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 8, 2008
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SARGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Delaware Capital Formation, Inc.
Wilmington, DE
Delaware Capital Formation, Inc.
Wilmington, DE
Delaware Capital Formation, Inc.
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James David Jacobs
James David Jacobs Baker & McKenzie LLP1114 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal fasteners, namely, screws, bolts, flashes, paw bolts, fuse pins | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 14, 2007 |
| 007 | Hydraulic and pneumatic components, namely, valves for fluid control, hydraulic and pneumatic pistons, hydraulic and pneumatic valve actuators, servos for fluid actuators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 14, 2007 |
| 012 | Hydraulic and pneumatics components for vehicles, namely, valves for fluid control, hydraulic and pneumatic pistons, hydraulic and pneumatic valve actuators, servos for fluid actuators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 14, 2007 |
| 037 | Repair and servicing of hydraulic and pneumatic components, namely, valves, pistons, actuators, fasteners, servos | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1984 |
| 042 | Design of hydraulic and pneumatic components for others, namely, valves, pistons, actuators, fasteners, servos for fluid actuators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1943 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Delaware Capital Formation, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Delaware Capital Formation, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Delaware Capital Formation, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SARGENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |