USPTO serial 76441901
LITTLE ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LITTLE ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Kelly
WILEY REIN & FIELDING LLP1776 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-2304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated ointments, skin creams, gels, sprays and lotions for treatment of cuts and burns, sunburn relief, general rashes, canker sores and acne, chafing and other skin conditions; sprays for baby rash | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |