USPTO serial 76442089
FRUTIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRUTIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
UNI-PRESIDENT ENTERPRISES CORP.
Yeong Kang Shih, Tainan Hsien, TW
UNI-PRESIDENT ENTERPRISES CORP.
Yeong Kang Shih, Tainan Hsien, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Price
ANDREW D PRICE VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; non-alcoholic beverages; namely, fruit drinks and soft drinks; aerated water; aerated water flavored with fruit juice; carbonated water; mineral water; purified water flavored with fruit juice; isotonic drinks; fruit juice; diluted fruit juice; fruit-vegetable juice; vegetable juice; soft drinks containing added nutrients and vitamins not for medicinal purposes; chrysanthemum soft drinks; sugar cane juice; white gourd soft drinks; asparagus juice; honey date juice; almond soft drinks; soft drinks made of rice; soft drinks made of soya bean; non-alcoholic soft drinks containing pulp; purified water; tomato juice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |