Drawing for GENE SIGNATURE

USPTO serial 76442091

GENE SIGNATURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GENE SIGNATURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason I. Hewitt, Esq.

JASON I HEWITT ESQ ATTN TMSUMORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SOFTWARE USED TO ANALYZE MICROARRAY DATA FROM ONE OR MORE EXPERIMENTS AND DETERMINE STATISTICALLY WHETHER OR NOT A GENE HAS BEEN EXPRESSEDACTIVEOct 20, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Dec 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 26, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 26, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 24, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 7, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance