USPTO serial 76442160
RUBICON OUTFITTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUBICON OUTFITTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE J. BIELEN, JR.
THEODORE J BIELEN JR BIELEN, LAMPE & THOEMING1990 N CALIFORNIA BLVD STE 720WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Catalogue And Retail Sales Of Transmission, Steering And Suspension Parts For Vehicles, Namely, Shock Absorbers, Springs, Torsion Bars, Sway Bars, Axle Control Arms, Track Bars, Drop Pitman Arms, Bump Stops, Lifts, Lift Shackles, Driver Shafts, Frame Braces, Brake Lines, Spring Pads, Spring Plates, Shims, Sway Bars Disconnects, U-bolts, Tie Rods, Brake Air Lines, Axle Brackets, Axles, Slip Yokes And Wheels For Vehicles, Motorcycle Accessories, Including Tires, Chains, Sprockets, Engine Parts, Bumpers, Fenders And Seats, Bicycles And Bicycle Components, Namely, Frame Suspensions, Tires, Handle Bars, Gears, Vehicle Racks, Vehicle Lights, Vehicle Camping Equipment, Namely, Tables, Coolers, Refrigerators And Tents And Winches, Cables And Strap Hooks | ACTIVE | Jul 30, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |