Drawing for GREENAGE

USPTO serial 76442285

GREENAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GREENAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow

MARK LEBOW YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004illuminants, namely, candles and wicks for candles, oil lampsACTIVE—
014precious metals and their alloys and precious metal goods in the nature of jewelry, gemstones, and horological and chronometric instruments of precious metalACTIVE—
024textiles and textile goods, namely, fabric bed and table covers, household linen, and table linenACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, bandanas, Bermuda shorts, leather coats, peignoirs, maillots, sandals, trousers, suits consisting of coats or jackets and trousers, dresses, skirts, thongs, bandeaux, bikinis, sport coats, gym suits, jeans, sweat shirts, tunics, sweaters, capes, raincoats, overcoats, bathing suits, wind resistant jackets, suit coats, hats, jodhpurs, polo shirts, shirts, turbans, T-shirts, cardigans, pantaloons, lingerie, robes, shoes and headgearACTIVE—
026bobbin lace, lace trimming, embroidery, ribbons and braid; buttons for clothing, rivet buttons, press buttons,shirt buttons, hook and eyes, and safety, ornamental novelty, hat and hair pins, needles; artificial flowersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 9, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 10, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance