USPTO serial 76442468
MOONRAKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOONRAKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CA
BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
INGRID E. SCHMIDT
ANNE F DOWNEY DOWNEY & DOWNEY8999 ROCKWOOD RDBOSTON, NY 14025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | TINTED, LAMINATED AND REFLECTIVE PLASTIC FILMS FOR USE IN AUTOMOBILE WINDOWS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |