USPTO serial 76443018
PEACOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3468395Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 2008
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PEACOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hamilton HM LX, BM
Hamilton HM LX, BM
Hamilton HM LX, BM
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned meat, namely, luncheon meat, Corned beef, Vienna sausages; Poultry; Frozen meats; Meat extracts; Preserved, dried, cooked canned fruits and canned vegetables; Canned, prepared frozen fish, namely, tuna, mackerel, sardines, herring, salmon; Canned seafood, namely, shrimp, oysters, crab, lobster; Soups, namely, chicken noodle soup, canned soups, dried soups, soup mixes; Jams; Jellies; Marmalades; Dairy derived products, namely, processed cheese, butter; Sour cream; Whipping cream; Yogurt; Milk products, namely, milk, condensed milk; Milk based drinks, namely, flavored milk; Peanut butter; Coconut milk; Coconut cream; Edible oils and fats, namely, olive oil, canola oil; Pastes, namely, fruit pastes, vegetable pastes, meat pastes, tomato paste; Processed pulses, namely, lentils, peas, beans; Pickles; Hot pepper paste; cranberry sauce and/or apple sauce | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 15, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Terfloth Trade Marks Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Terfloth Trade Marks Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Terfloth Trade Marks Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named PEACOCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |