USPTO serial 76443235
PLATO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLATO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Quinn
ANDREW QUINN SONY ELECTRONICS INC16530 VIA ESPRILLOMZ 7345SAN DIEGO, CA 92127Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Compact disc player/recorders, compact disc player/recorders with AM/FM radio and cassette player/recorders, portable compact disc player/recorders, portable compact disc player/recorders with AM/FM radio, mini disc player/recorders, portable mini disc player/recorders, cassette player/recorders, cassette player/recorders with AM/FM radios, portable cassette player/recorders, portable cassette player/recorders with AM/FM radios, blank cards for storage of digital data, network digital music players, satellite radio receivers, headphones, earphones, portable radios, portable digital voice recorders, radios, radios featuring clocks, radios featuring clocks and compact disc players, baby audio monitoring system comprised of radio transmitters and receivers, personal computers, digital camcorders, digital still cameras, televisions, portable televisions, car stereo products, namely, loudspeakers, amplifiers, compact disc players, mini disc players, MP3 players; stereo tuners, digital printers, boom boxes, DVD players, personal digital assistants, video tape recorders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |