USPTO serial 76443305
WE BRING VALUE TO LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WE BRING VALUE TO LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George M. Thomas
GEORGE M THOMAS THOMAS, KAYDEN HORSTEMEYER & RISLEYSTE 1750 100 GALLERIA PKWY N WATLANTA, GA 30339-5948UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing and career networking services for individuals who have disabilities and disadvantages; employment counseling in the form of pre-employment evaluation services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing job seminars and training for individuals who have disabilities and disadvantages, namely, providing seminars and training in the use and operation of telephone switchboards, fax and copy machines, and scanners, providing training in the use of computers, construction tools and machinery, food service preparation equipment, janitorial and grounds maintenance equipment, and training services in the field of building trades, computer applications, computer hardware, customer service, janitorial, toner cartridge service, mailroom, data management, food service, enrichment/life skills | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Psychological testing services, namely, testing of individuals who have disabilities and disadvantages for employment evaluation purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bobby Dodd Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BOBBY DODD INSTITUTE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BOBBY DODD INSTITUTE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named WE BRING VALUE TO LIFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |