Drawing for MIXIM PLUS BI DIRECTIONAL

USPTO serial 76443800

MIXIM PLUS BI DIRECTIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIXIM PLUS BI DIRECTIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark W. Good

MARK W GOOD TERRA LAW LLP60 S MARKET ST STE 200SAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Corrugated boxes for packaging fruits and vegetablesACTIVE—
020Plastic containers for packaging fruits and vegetables; packing containers of plastic material; plastic cratesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 18, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 29, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance