USPTO serial 76444008
NEUROCUFFSTIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEUROCUFFSTIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NeuroStream Technologies, Inc.
Port Coquitlam, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEE E. JOHNSON
RODNEY C TULLETT REG NO 34 034CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PL1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Biomedical equipment, namely, implantable neuromuscular stimulation systems comprised of nerve cuffs with flexible cables and sensors for delivering signals and/or power from implantable biomedical devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |