USPTO serial 76444096
EROS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EROS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Predente Prudente, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik M. Pelton, Esq.
ERIK M PELTON ESQ ERIK M PELTON, ATTORNEY AT LAW1408 N FILLMORE ST STE 2ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Acoustic and sound reinforcement equipment, namely, acoustic lenses for loudspeaker horns; analog and digital sound mixer units, cabinets and enclosures for high fidelity audio,active and passive audio dividing network consisting of a device commonly known as a 'crossover' for use with loudspeaker cabinets, all sold as a unit for speaker systems, drivers in the nature of audio speaker parts for all frequency ranges; electrical cable and connectors,electronic signal processors, equalizers, headphones, high frequency transducers that convert electrical impulses received at its voice coil to acoustic signals through its cone, stage monitor loudspeakers, and side-fill loudspeakers, home-theater loudspeakers, in-wall loudspeakers, loudspeakers, loudspeaker drivers, loudspeaker folded horn enclosures, all sold as a unit, microphones, microphone attenuators, microphone carrying cases,microphone filters, electrical power supplies for microphones, microphone stands,microphone stand clamps and mounts, microphone switches, microphone transformers, microphone windscreens,- co-axial and electrical cables and wires,- and accessories for sound mixers, namely, expander consoles, meter bridges, support stands, equipment racks, rack mount brackets, connecting and mounting brackets, and mounting rails, all for use with mixers, master faders, musical instrument amplifiers, passive radiators (non-energized loudspeakers) for stereo enclosures, powered loudspeakers, power sound amplifiers, pre-amplifiers, public address systems consisting of loudspeakers, amplifiers, audio mixers, and microphones, all sold as a unit, speakers, speaker cabinets, speaker drivers, baffles, and enclosures, transducer energizers in the nature of power amplifiers for public addressing,stage monitor and side-fill loudspeaker enclosures, electrical transformers for use with loudspeakers, volume controls | ACTIVE | Oct 4, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |