USPTO serial 76444168
SHADE IN A BAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHADE IN A BAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London, Ontario, CA
London, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Mitchell
CHRISTOPHER A MITCHELL YOUNG & BASILE, PC3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metal exterior window blinds | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |