USPTO serial 76444288
ARTRAGEOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARTRAGEOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Herbert
PAUL HERBERT RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT LLPSTE 1800 2 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys, games and playthings, namely mechanical actions toys, electrical action toys, toy arrows, toy bows, toy arrow and bow sets, baby multiple activity toys, bath toys, bathtub toys, battery operated action toys, bendable toys, cat toys, children's activity tables containing manipulative toys which convert to easels, children's multiple activity toys, children's wire construction and art activity toys, construction toys, crib toys, disk toss toys, dog toys, drawing toys, electric action toys, fantasy character toys, flying toy saucers, infant toys, inflatable ride on toys, inflatable toys, musical toys, non-riding transportation toys, party favors in the nature of small toys, plastic character toys, play mats containing infant toys, plush toys, pop-up toys, printing toys, pull toys, punching toys, push toys, ride-on toys, rubber character toys, sandbox toys, sketching toys, soft sculpture toys, squeeze toys, stuffed toys, talking toys, water squirting toys, windup toys, dolls and accessories therefore, doll play sets, toy ovens, toy ice cream makers, toy yogurt makers, toy ice cube makers, toy sherbert makers, toy snow cone makers, toy slushie makers, Christmas tree ornaments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |