USPTO serial 76444402
DELVIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DELVIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FIN-20101 Turku, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L. White, Esquire
ADRIENNE L WHITE ESQ BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS, LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS FOR USE IN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY, NAMELY, POLYMERS FOR USE AS A DRUG DELIVERY VEHICLE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF TIMED RELEASE DRUGS OR FOR USE AS DRUG DELIVERY COMPONENT OF TIMED RELEASE DRUGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY PATCHES, IMPLANTS, INTRAVAGINAL RINGS, INTRAUTERINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS, IMPLANTABLE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS, ALL FOR LONG-TERM TREATMENT OF CHRONIC DISEASES, FOR CONTRACEPTION, FOR MAINTENANCE OF HEALTH, FOR SUPPORTIVE AND ADJUVANT THERAPY, AND FOR DEFICIENCY OR SUBSTITUTION THERAPY | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY PATCHES, IMPLANTS, INTRAVAGINAL RINGS, INTRAUTERINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS, IMPLANTABLE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS, ALL SOLD WITHOUT MEDICATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF DRUG DELIVERY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |