Drawing for ETERNAL VISION

USPTO serial 76444408

ETERNAL VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETERNAL VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John J. Kane

JOHN J KANE SPERRY, ZODA & KANESTE D ONE HIGHGATE DRTRENTON, NJ 08618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009INTERACTIVE ELECTRONIC AND DIGITAL EQUIPMENT FOR USE IN A MEMORIAL FOR THE DECEASED, NAMELY, VIDEO MONITORS, LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY MONITORS, PLASMA MONITORS FOR FACILITATING VIEWING OF DATA OR SIGNAL INFORMATION, MEDIA STORAGE AND DELIVERY EQUIPMENT IN THE NATURE OF PRERECORDED DVDS, PRERECORDED COMPACT DISCS, AND COMPUTER MEMORY RAM AND ROM CARDS CONTAINING INFORMATION ON RELATIVE TO THE DECEASED INDIVIDUAL, SUCH MEMORIALS ALSO CONTAINING HOUSINGS FOR HOLDING OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, SOLAR RECEPTORS AND CHARGERS AS WELL AS SECURITY AND SUPPORT, NAMELY, RADIO AND CELLULAR TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS, AND SOLAR PANELS FOR CHARGING OF POWER SOURCES AND CELLULAR PHONES AND ANTENNAS WHICH ARE BUILT INTO THE MEMORIAL FOR USE IN COMMUNICATING BETWEEN THE CENTRAL STATION AND THE HOUSING FOR THE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 28, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 18, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance