Drawing for TELL IT WELL

USPTO serial 76444531

TELL IT WELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELL IT WELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

Stephen L Baker Baker and Rannells PA575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting services; market research and market analysis rendered to businesses in the fields of market research, market analysis, public relations, sales force development, establishing business plans; marketing services, namely, development of strategic marketing plans; preparation of sales and marketing materials, namely, positioning strategy, communications strategy, creative development and implementation, editorial services, and information design; preparing advertising and marketing materials, namely, identity, brand architecture and implementation, marketing collateral, forms management, and information design; and providing marketing advice relating to website design for others engaged in the fields of business, management, human resources and technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance