USPTO serial 76445172
FIORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Valerie du Laney
VALERIE DU LANEY MILLER NASH LLP4400 TWO UNION SQ 601 UNION STSEATTLE, WA 98101-2352UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely anklets, anoraks, aprons, athletic footwear, athletic shoes, bandanas, baseball caps, bath slippers, bathing caps, bathing suits, bathing trunks, bathrobes, beach cover ups, beach shoes, beachwear, belts, berets, bermuda shorts, bikinis, blazers, blouses, body shapers, body suits, bottoms, boxer shorts, bras, bus tiers, camisoles, caps, cardigans, chemises, coats, crop tops, denim jackets, dusters, evening gowns, fleece pullovers, gloves, gowns, halter tops, hats, head wear, heels, hosiery, jackets, jeans, jogging suits, jump suits, kerchiefs, kimonos, knit shirts, leather jackets, leg warmers, leggings, leotards, lingerie, lounge wear, miniskirts, mittens, neckwear, negligees, night gowns, night shirts, overalls, overcoats, overshoes, pajamas, panties, pants, pantyhose, pedal pushers, peignoirs, polo shirts, ponchos, pullovers, rainwear, robes, rompers, sandals, saris, sarongs, sashes, scarves, shawls, shirts, shoes, shorts, skirts, slacks, sleep wear, slippers, sneakers, socks, stockings, suits, sun suits, sweat suits, sweaters, swim wear, swimsuits, tank tops, tights, trousers, t-shirts, undergarments, underwear, unitards, veils, vests, v-neck sweaters, walking shorts, warm up suits, wedding gowns and wraps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |