USPTO serial 76445173
FIORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yuval H. Marcus
Yuval H. Marcus GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN P.C.270 Madison Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All purpose sport bags, all-purpose athletic bags, animal carriers, animal harnesses, animal leashes, athletic bags, attache cases, baby backpacks, baby carriers worn on the body, backpacks, beach bags, billfolds, book bags, boston bags, briefbags, briefcases, briefcase-type portfolios, business card cases, business cases, calling card cases, carry-on bags, catalog cases, change purses, clothing for animals, clutch bags, clutch purses, coin purses, collars for pets bearing medical information, cosmetic bags sold empty, cosmetic cases sold empty, credit card cases, day packs, diaper bags, document cases, dog apparel, drawstring pouches, duffel bags, fanny packs, garment bags for travel, golf umbrellas, gym bags, handbags, hat boxes for travel, key cases, knapsacks, leashes for animals, leather shopping bags, leggings for animals, lipstick holders, luggage, luggage tags, mats and pads made of fabric for use with animal training, name card cases, non-motorized, collapsible luggage carts, overnight bags, overnight cases, parasols, pet clothing, pocketbooks, purses, satchels, school bags, shaving bags sold empty, shoe bags for travel, shoulder bags, suit bags, suitcases, toiletry cases sold empty, tote bags, train cases, travel bags, bags, trunks, umbrellas, vanity cases sold empty, waist packs, and wallets, | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Isabella Fiore, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Isabella Fiore, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ISABELLA FIORE SPV, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named FIORE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |