USPTO serial 76445400
HEARBEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3006849Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2005
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HEARBEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mt. Lebanon, PA, US
Mt. Lebanon, PA, US
Mt. Lebanon, PA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick L. Tolhurst
Frederick L. Tolhurst COHEN & GRIGSBY, P.C.625 LIBERTY AVENUEPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-3152UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring the goods of others, namely, hearing aids | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 27, 2001 |
| 044 | Health care services, namely, providing audiologic evaluations and providing individualized treatment and rehabilitation plans related thereto; hearing aid services related to fitting, testing and servicing of hearing aids | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 27, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 17, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |