USPTO serial 76445457
ROCK CREEK RANCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3004699Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2005
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROCK CREEK RANCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RCR FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Horseshoe Bay, TX
RCR FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Horseshoe Bay, TX
PORT NECHES, TX
CHARLES MICHAEL FRANZ PARTNERSHIP, THE
PORT NECHES, TX
Other trademarks owned by CHARLES MICHAEL FRANZ PARTNERSHIP, THE
RCR FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
PORT NECHES, TX
PORT NECHES, TX
CHARLES MICHAEL FRANZ PARTNERSHIP, THE
PORT NECHES, TX
Other trademarks owned by CHARLES MICHAEL FRANZ PARTNERSHIP, THE
RCR FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
PORT NECHES, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Leasing real estate for hunting and cattle grazing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RCR FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by RCR FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by CHARLES MICHAEL FRANZ
- Other trademarks owned by CHARLES MICHAEL FRANZ PARTNERSHIP, THE
- Other trademarks owned by RCR FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by CHARLES MICHAEL FRANZ
- Other trademarks owned by CHARLES MICHAEL FRANZ PARTNERSHIP, THE
- Other trademarks owned by RCR FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named ROCK CREEK RANCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |