USPTO serial 76445552
IDENTIF TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2004
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IDENTIF TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
91056 Erlangen, DE
91056 Erlangen, DE
91056 Erlangen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan Kupersmith Larkin
JOAN KUPERSMITH LARKIN SEYFARTH SHAWONE CENTURY PLZ2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 3300LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3063Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Kits comprised of chemicals and biochemicals for labeling consumer products, technical products and pharmaceutical products, seals stamps, signatures, id-cards and badges with dna or thin films detectable by the humane eye and analyzing devices for use in prevention of counterfeiting and product diversion | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Software for use in the security device industry to authenticate individually different codes in order to safeguard the authenticity of products and control the sale of products; laser scanners; scientific and controlling apparatus, namely, pens that apply detection molecules, in particular labeled dna-molecules for the purpose of authenticating consumer products, seals, stamps, signatures, id-cards and badges | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Printing of labels on all different materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consultancy in the field of authentication of products to prevent counterfeits, namely, technical solutions and applications of technical solutions to detect counterfeit objects, namely, consumer products, technical products and pharmaceutical products, seals, stamps, signatures, id-cards and badges, and to prevent objects from being counterfeited; updating and maintenance of security codes and security labels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by November AG
- Other trademarks owned by November AG
- Other trademarks owned by November AG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IDENTIF TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |