Drawing for ATBOX TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 76445726

ATBOX TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATBOX TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic and computer products and related accessories, namely data communication connectors and parts thereof, cable assembiles comprised of connector housing, cable/wire, transfer switches, converters, printer buffers, modular patch panels, computer networking products, namely, baluns, adapters, active passive bubs, boosters, network attached storage NAS, equipment mounting racks for computer amplifiers, KVM devices, server and PCs, computer structural components, namely, printed circuit boards, resistors, capacitors, interface testers, data scopes, data line testers, cable testers, modems, power conditioning products, namely, power surge outlet strips, power centers, namely, local/remote IP controlled on and off switch, power line filters, uninterrupted power supplies, power converters and adapters, consumer electric/electronic equipment products and related accessories, namely, audio/visual switches, converters, line/signal drivers for distribution amplifiers, radio and other structural components, namely, printed circuit boards, resistors, capacitors, ICs, ASICs, network testers and external hard disk driveACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
May 17, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITIONโ€”
May 17, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTEDโ€”
May 17, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVEDโ€”
Apr 26, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Oct 24, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 24, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Oct 24, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Apr 12, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Apr 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 26, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 11, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITIONโ€”
Nov 11, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 11, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVEDโ€”
Oct 26, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Sep 9, 2005WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTEDโ€”
Sep 9, 2005WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVEDโ€”
Apr 15, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Apr 15, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Apr 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 3, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
May 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Apr 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Apr 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Oct 22, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRSโ€”
Aug 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Aug 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance