USPTO serial 76445748
DONE IN ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DONE IN ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irvine, CA
San Juan Capistrano, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
PERRY J VISCOUNTY LATHAM & WATKINS LLP650 TOWN CTR DR STE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626-7135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Dental cosmetic materials, namely, toothpastes, tooth gels, tooth whiteners, tooth bleaching preparations, and dentrifrices | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Dental bleaching trays | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Dental cleaning devices and oral hygiene devices, namely, toothbrushes; electric toothbrushes, flossers, tongue brushes, interdental cleaners and toothpicks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Amden Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Amden Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named DONE IN ONE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |