USPTO serial 76445888
ROSLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2004
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ROSLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rosler Oberflachentechnik GmbH
Bad Staffelstein, DE
BAD STAFFELSTEIN, DE
Rosler Oberflachentechnik GmbH
D-96231 Bad Staffelstein, DE
Rosler Oberflachentechnik GmbH
D-96231 Bad Staffelstein, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Vern
Max Vern AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Grinding media, namely, ceramic chips, plastic chips, metallic chips, metallic grains, mineral grains and sand for use in grinding and polishing machines; grinding compounds in paste or liquid form for use with metal, wood, ceramic or plastic media | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Power operated machines for the working of metal, wood, ceramic and plastics, namely, vibratory grinding machines; round vibrators; partitioning and separating apparatus, namely machines; centrifugal vibratory grinding machines; through vibrators; washing machines for processed parts; magnetic separation machines; acoustically insulated cabins and acoustically insulated covers; shot blasting machines, all of the above goods for use in grinding and polishing metal, wood, ceramic and plastic | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Abrasion and machining services, namely, abrasive machining of surfaces using polishing machines, vibratory grinding machines, centrifugal vibratory grinding machines and shot blasting machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rosler Oberflachentechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by R�SLER HOLDING GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Rosler Oberflachentechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Rosler Oberflachentechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ROSLER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 26, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 26, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |