Drawing for AGSI

USPTO serial 76446024

AGSI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGSI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Willsey, Esq.

PETER J WILLSEY COOLEY GODWARD LLP11951 FREEDOM DRONE FREEDOM SQ RESTON TOWN CTRRESTON, VA 20190-5656

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications consultations; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable and satellite transmissionsACTIVE—
042Computer project management services; computer software development, integration of computer systems and networks; consulting in the field of computer networks, data recovery; database development and administration services; website development and maintenance services for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems; technical support, namely, providing back-up computer programs and facilities; managing and assessing computer networks for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 3, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance