USPTO serial 76446209
HEALTHY VALUE MEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2971536Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HEALTHY VALUE MEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHANIE K. WADE
Stephanie K. Wade Dickstein Shapiro LLP1825 Eye Street, NWWashington, DC 20006-5403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named HEALTHY VALUE MEAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 23, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |