Drawing for GRANDIS

USPTO serial 76446218

GRANDIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3018935Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 29, 2005
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with GRANDIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobiles and structural parts thereforSECTION 8 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Nov 29, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 1, 2005DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION
Sep 28, 2005IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Sep 28, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Sep 9, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Sep 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance