Drawing for FLUENCY: THE ART OF CROSSING BORDERS

USPTO serial 76446530

FLUENCY: THE ART OF CROSSING BORDERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2868445Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 3, 2004
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with FLUENCY: THE ART OF CROSSING BORDERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Garry A. Berger

GARRY A BERGER58 HOLMSTEAD LNRIDGEFIELD, CT 06877UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely conducting workshops, seminars and conferences in the field of workforce diversity, namely identifying and addressing issues relating to the ability of people of different cultural and ethnic backgrounds to work together effectively, and improving the productivity of persons in a culturally and ethnically diverse workforceSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2011C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Aug 3, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance