USPTO serial 76446683
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcia A. Auberger
MARCIA A AUBERGER VENEABLE, BAETJER, HOWARD & CIVILETTI1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telephones; mobile, cordless or wireless telephones, antennas; repeaters; apparatus for storing, transmission, receiving, recording or reproducing of sound, data, images and/or video, namely, radio port,radio port control unit, fixed access unit, base stations, base station controllers; receivers, namely, telephone receivers, audio receivers,video receivers, data receivers; transmitters, namely, audio transmitters, video transmitters, data transmitters, telephone transmitters; transceivers; software and computer programs used for transmission and reproducing and receiving of sound, data, images and video in telecommunications networks and wireless subscriber loops and for enhancing and facilitating the use and access to computer networks and telephone networks; personal digital assistants, namely PDAs; radio pagers, semiconductor chips;integrated circuits | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |